How to Choose the Right Journal for Your Research Paper: A Complete Guide
Scope, indexing, audience and turnaround, weighed in the right order. The method that avoids a desk rejection six weeks after submission.
Read full articleScope, indexing, audience and turnaround, weighed in the right order. The method that avoids a desk rejection six weeks after submission.
Read full articleArchive
One is a method for finding and appraising evidence. The other is a statistical technique applied to it. Many papers confuse the two in their own title.
Read full articleProtocol, search, screening, appraisal, synthesis. The stages in order, and the points where reviews most often fail peer review.
Read full articleEffect sizes, model choice, heterogeneity and publication bias. What to calculate, in what order, and what reviewers will ask for.
Read full articleTwenty-seven items, a flow diagram and an abstract checklist. What changed from 2009, and the items authors most often miss.
Read full articleA good topic is narrow, answerable with resources you have, and matters to someone other than you. Here is how to arrive at one.
Read full articleSix places gaps reliably hide, and how to tell a genuine gap from a question nobody asks because the answer does not matter.
Read full articleMeSH terms, field tags, Boolean structure and filters. How to build a search a reviewer can reproduce exactly.
Read full articleIMRaD in the order you should actually write it, which is not the order it is read in.
Read full articleMost rejections happen before peer review and for reasons that have nothing to do with the quality of the research.
Read full articleThree databases, three different purposes. Which one your institution counts, and which one you should search.
Read full articleFour questions decide almost every test. Answer them in order and the choice is usually made for you.
Read full articleThree packages, three different trade-offs between learning curve, reproducibility and cost. Which fits your work.
Read full articleFive guidelines, five study designs. Using the wrong one is as visible to a reviewer as using none.
Read full articleAnswer every point, locate every change, and disagree properly where the evidence supports you. Editors read the letter before the manuscript.
Read full articleOne page telling the editor why this paper suits this journal. Not a summary of the abstract they can already read.
Read full articleMost plagiarism findings are not deliberate theft. They are patchwriting, uncited method descriptions and reusing your own earlier text.
Read full articleA thesis proves you can do research. A paper tells one story. Converting between them means deciding what to throw away.
Read full articleVerify the indexing, match the scope, meet the standard. The route is unremarkable; the shortcuts are what cause trouble.
Read full articleFour review types, four different questions. Choosing the wrong one commits you to months of work that will not answer what you asked.
Read full articleWhere to publish remote sensing and GIS research, how to judge fit, and what each tier of journal actually expects.
Read full articleWhere to publish Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy research, and the reporting standards that decide acceptance.
Read full articleWhere to publish homoeopathy research, and the methodological reporting that determines whether it is taken seriously.
Read full articlePublishing brief
One email a month on indexing, research integrity and editorial practice. Unsubscribe in a click; we do not sell the list.